My Werks

   

Reflections on the U.S. Social Forum
Is Another World Really Possible?

The motto for the U.S. Social Forum "another world is possible, another U.S. is necessary" captures in its simplicity the credo of those who are committed to building a more peaceful and just society. If this bold statement is but an unproven theory, then the collective experience of the participants may serve as test for the hypothesis. My participation at the Forum June 27th through July 1st (as a volunteer, workshop attendee, and offsite workshop facilitator) deepened my understanding of the value of such mass activist gatherings. The quality of dialogue, and the warmth and affection among attendees attested to the probability that a better world is indeed possible. Yet, the structural limitations of the progressive movement and the occasional actions I witnessed from those seeking power, emulating dominator culture, countered my estimation of those possibilities.

Every workshop and several informal discussions raised my consciousness about what levels of change are possible. I was inspired by the belief that such change is not only doable, it must be done in order to expand peace and justice in the world. I learned key lessons from the content of the presentations as well as the unplanned incidents. These lessons conveyed the possibilities of "another world", a more progressive world transformed by critical praxis that is grounded in love. They were not exclusively provided through the theories and experiences we discussed. They were evident in the spirit of our interactions between workshops, the ways that we greeted and cared for each other, and the patience and compassion we showed one another when problems arose.

In "Pedagogy of the Oppressed", Friere offers dialogue as the primary tool of liberating the oppressed so that they may lead themselves and their oppressors to build an egalitarian society. The Forum in several ways exemplified this principle. For example, with the workshop "Ending the prison industrial complex and developing models for transformative justice", the organizers from Critical Resistance held a dialogue in which participants were encouraged to share perspectives, ask questions, and challenge each other including the facilitators.This was done in a mutually respectful way that incorporated critical reflection on the part of the speaker and the listeners. The discussion addressed community accountability models to stem the violence against women and other people.

After I shared my suggestions about how men could teach each other to examine and resist patriarchy, a facilitator asked that others refrain from using binary gender language. She was clearly referring to my statement and perhaps earlier examples. At first, I felt embarrassed and unappreciated because of my good intentions. Then I examined my own thoughts, distinguished between the intended meaning and the effect of my words, and reinterpreted the feedback as useful. I thanked her for the language check and we began a discussion that lasted for about 30 minutes. The gift of humility helps me to remain receptive rather than defended against criticism and enabled me to establish a connection with an organizer I came to admire.

In order for us to unlock oppression systems we have to constantly examine the ways in which they interlock and reinforce each other. To this end, important connections were highlighted as focal points of action. The Thursday plenary "Gulf reconstruction in the post Katrina era" featured a group of organizers who told compelling stories about the repopulating of New Orleans and other areas by mostly white middle class gentry, and the use of immigrant laborers whose labor is exploited in the reconstruction projects throughout the gulf. Several speakers thus drew lines between the displacement of lower income people of color, the manipulation and enslavement of other low income people of color to rebuild areas to be inhabited my higher income, mostly white homeowners. This discussion focused on the nation’s most egregious example of large scale dehumanization arguably since the early years of the AIDS epidemic. As such, it was duly prioritized as a plenary discussion available to the vast majority of attendees. Change is made possible when the interconnected nature of our oppression is clearly explained not only with academic concepts but narratives of real human struggle guided by analysis as was provided by the gulf area organizers.

On Friday evening, I co-facilitated a discussion for Black gay men attending the Forum entitled "We are worth wanting each other: black gay men and the politics of desire". My co-facilitator Charles Stephens is a 26 year old graduate of Georgia State University, a feminist scholar and a radical Black gay activist. It was exciting to engage in this work with a fellow organizer twenty years younger as we learn from each other while modeling for others the possibilities of cross generational partnerships and dialogue. In this discussion, 14 Black gay men explored how our sexual desires and relationships shape our social justice values and how our social justice values influence our sexual desires and relationships. We had planned to spend half of the time focusing on how we became involved in progressive activism and identifying Black gay men in the lineage of activist history. But as the conversation unfolded, it became clear that participants really wanted to examine the alignment, the dissonance and the compartmentalization between our erotic lives and our political work.

Charles and I found it quite freeing to guide the flow of dialogue as redirected by the group while sharing our experiences as peers. One brother spoke about how several of his partners either complained or mocked his love of reading and his other intellectual pursuits. Another spoke out about feeling marginalized within black gay communities because he is a large man and often unseen or not regarded as sexually attractive. Several of us examined our lack of attraction to men whom we perceive to be more feminine than we perceive ourselves to be, and compared those patterns to our analyses of internalized oppression and the maladaptive strategy to "perform" as hetero normative to avoid persecution. We created an atmosphere of warmth and trust, and enjoyed a deep fraternity in that moment.

This was one of the most enlightening spaces of my Forum experience because it confirmed the possibility and the importance of healing ourselves from the shaming we endured from our parents, peers, and communities. In her essay "Uses of the Erotic: The Erotic as Power" Audre Lorde underlines the partriarchal suppression and manipulation of the erotic power of women. Women are thus taught to revile that power within themselves unless it is in the service of pleasuring men. Black gay men face similar constraints as men who due to our sexual orientation are gender traitors whose erotic nature is condemned. When we interrogate the ways in which we distance ourselves from our erotic nature or betray our commitment to self acceptance by partnering with self hating men who in turn shame us, we begin to recognize our power. I was so inspired to witness that recognition in several men who named the intermittent joy they experienced when they allowed themselves to be vulnerable, to be fully human and not necessarily masculine.

Another world is possible when gay men extend their radical transgression beyond the proscriptions of sexual propriety and shatter the confines of patriarchal masculinity itself by tapping into their erotic power. When Black gay men are able to relinquish masculinist limitations that do not allow them to express themselves because such expression is reviled by the same perspective that fears the feminine, they shatter the shackles they have inherited from generations of servitude to patriarchy. When Black gay men commit themselves to engage in work that fulfills them, to unhinge themselves from toxic relationships, to seek intimate bonds where they are valued in the entirety of their personhood, and to engage in mutually pleasurable sexual relationships where they can satisfy primal desires unfettered by ascetic values, then infinite possibilities are engendered. We demonstrate for other Black men including heterosexual Black men, other possibilities, revolutionary ways of being non-partriarchal men who have the courage to be tender, to express fuller spectrums of feminine and masculine energies that reside in all human beings. We show our brothers we can enjoy vibrant and healing sexuality without shame or mutual dehumanization, and that we may dare to love deeply and be loved for all that we are, without using sex as a surrogate for the love we need but dare not seek or share. We inform all men that we do not have to dim our emotional wavelength, or remain bound to rigid armor that binds us, behavior codes that curtail they way we walk, talk and breathe, flat proscriptions that flatten our life energy. This discussion holds lessons for us all that the erotic, in the form of sexuality, or the passion we experience through the art, the work, the love that brings us utter joy, can and does transform society. I was thus reminded why the denigration and suppression of this energy is critical to the maintaining of the status quo and the culture of domination. The erotic is antithetical to oppression because to be oppressed is to be denied humanity and to be in touch with the erotic is to be fully human.

Throughout the course of the Forum, I received messages and observed behaviors which tested my faith in the possibility for real change. First was the overriding sense of scarcity which at times seemed to drown out the pep speeches about creatively generating funds and building resources. The fact that the workshop, "The revolution will not be funded" was occupied beyond capacity speaks to the concerns of many organizers who do not have enough means to support the work they are doing. Another disappointment was the way in which the left movements replicate the dominant culture norms. In the plenary "Liberating gender and sexuality" Suzanne Pharr cautioned us to notice and challenge the sexism of commonly exercised in so-called radical organizations. That was demoralizing even if necessary to hear considering that social justice organizing is already under funded and over burdened. Our work is only further crippled when we hold on to traditional differentials of power.

I was quite frustrated by the participation of one brother at the Critical Resistance workshop who took up an inordinate chunk of time postulating as if he had the sole answer to the problems we were analyzing. I thought that his endless pontificating was disrespectful to the facilitators and others present, and I wondered if all that cock strutting was an act of opposition against feminist leadership since women and transgendered folks were leading this serious dialogue about organizing values and strategies. As men of all sexual orientations engaged in radical organizing, we must be willing to identify, resist and challenge our use of male power, such as talking over or interrupting women and transgendered, or uncritically assuming leadership roles as if our gender entitles us to them. When we fail to check our sexism, especially the heterosexist, heteronormative patterns within the left movements, as if only conservatives and non-radicals can be sexist, then, in effect, we use the organizations built to eradicate patriarchy to restore patriarchal order. We must not forget that his same default to the privileged has been undermining anti-racist, feminist, and queer liberation movements for decades.

Fundamental social change is not possible without the building and agency of progressive coalitions. In order to build coalitions, people who may otherwise be focused on specific issues must recognize issues of common interest and must be willing and able to work together beyond differences of identity, and divergent strategies. The organizers of this forum went to great lengths to include and coordinate a wide battery of issues, movements, and communities on this world stage. To be a part of such a gathering, was to witness a commitment to underscoring the universal desire to liberate ourselves from oppression in order to be free, to reclaim humanity for ourselves and each other. You could see it in the wave of marchers of varied gender, race, age, language, physical ability returning to the Civic Center. Some looked sun drained, others simply exhilarated, but almost all appeared victorious.

Instead of marching, I had chosen to stay in the office and catch up on some work at Positive Impact. It was not just that I had missed one of the most significant marches of my lifetime to catch up on some paperwork. I knew that I had the opportunity to risk being behind in some work in order to be present for something that was more important to me. I realized that I could be different in how I approached my life and my work in a way that allows me to follow my spirit and uphold my commitments to others. By missing the march I had learned something about the importance of being present for the pivotal moments of my life even when I am not prepared or for them. Such possibilities may materialize without warning.

Craig Washington
"Your crown has been bought and paid for. All you must do is put it on your head." James Baldwin

return to mywerks

 

 
If you woudl like to comment on "Reflections" please click here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

©2005 craigwerks.com | 404.849.4461 | info@craigwerks.com